MythBusters Serbia Edition

Bombas briljira na ovoj temi

https://i.stack.imgur.com/3T6rY.gif

Dobro bre bombi znamo svi to jbg

moramo sebi da priznamo neke istine pre nego krenemo napred. Nasa nakaradna predstava o sopstvenom bicu gradjena od Garasaninove vlade u kojoj ministar zeleznice nije smeo da udje u voz, pa do vlade Ane Brnabic u kojoj ministat vojni nije bio sposoban za sluzenje vojske mora biti realisticno promenjena.

Kakav Tuluz Lotrek i njegovi vagabundi, ovde bi Brojgel imao posla (Milan Obrenovic).

Kk cokijevi puleni hahah

Hahahaha cokijevi puleni hahaha dobar stos hahaha presmijesno

Evo jedan mit da se bastuje:

Kazu da je ukupan svetski dug 237 trilona (po engleskom, a po naski biliona) dolara. Pa ako moze neko da mi objasni kome dugujemo te pare, jel vanzemaljcima jebenim ili sta?

ево ти на америчком

To be clear, the $237 trillion figure refers to 'public' debt, ie. government debt. It does not include private debt which is another figure and a separate story.

The money is owed directly and indirectly to 'savers'. Here are a few (somewhat simplified) examples:
БАНКЕ. Do you have cash deposited in a bank? Your banks will lend this money out to individuals, corporates and governments. Banks are generally heavy buyers of short term government bills, ie. they lend money to the US government on short term basis.
ФОНДОВИ. Have you invested your money in a bond fund or have money in a pension fund (or 401k)? Many bond funds and pension funds are heavy investors in government debt around the world (ie. lend it to different governments around the world).
ВЛАДЕ. Governments themselves are one of the largest holders of other governments' debt. For example, Japan and China are large holders of US government bonds. This is where it gets slightly complicated. A government can be both a borrower in one currency (usually its own) and saver in a different currency (usually the US dollar or Euro). A good example is Japan. Due to Japan's trade surplus, it holds a large US dollar foreign currency reserve. It will invest the US dollar in US government bonds (ie. lend it to the US government). However, Japan is a net borrower - it owes more in Yen than it has assets held in other currencies.

Does this matter to the common person? Yes, most definitely. A government unable to manage its debt balance will ultimately hurt savers like yourself (assuming you are a saver) and may topple an economy in extreme cases.

Don't forget that most currencies, including the US dollar, are fiat currencies. Fiat currencies are not backed by anything but 'faith' in the government. If the government is unable to repay the debt, it will have to 'print' money. Money printing leads to inflation, which ultimately (albeit slowly) transfers wealth away from the saver to the borrower. In extreme cases, massive printing of money leads to hyperinflation where the currency is 'debased' and rendered near worthless. The average life expectancy of a fiat currency is about 30 years 1. Don't kid yourself if you think it can never happen to you. The US dollar had to break away from the gold standard in 1971 because it was unable to balance payments and repay debt. We've had it pretty easy, so far.

You may be interested in a side note beyond the topic of this question. Inflation devalues a currency against another currency. It is meant to be economy's natural adjusting mechanism to improve a country's competitiveness. Ie. If the US dollar devalues against the Yen, it will make US goods more competitive relative to Japan. This has some implications:
Countries which control their own currency, such as the US, can print money to repay debt. In the process, they improve their competitiveness by being able to produce goods relatively cheaper. Of course, this has to be managed very carefully to avoid the currency going into the debasement death spiral. Print just enough money to pay some debt, improve competitiveness, maintain confidence and hope economic improvement will take care of the remaining debt. There is at least a way out.
This is why individual Eurozone members are in trouble. Greece, for example, does not control the Euro. They cannot print to repay debt. They are unable to adjust the competitiveness of their labor force because they are stuck with the Euro. The Greek government must make deep budget cuts which has repercussions to the broader economy and social confidence. One alternative is to break away from the Euro and reestablish the Greek Drachma - a draconian measure that tempts fate. To avoid a default (at least in the short term), Greece will need a German bailout and debt forgiveness. Does Germany want to go through with this and keep throwing good money after bad? However, a Greek default will have widespread repercussions across the Eurozone (remember many banks, funds and governments hold Greek government debt). Does Germany want to risk financial and political contagion? The Euro is structurally flawed and there are many historical, political and long term economic consequences for Germany (and other Eurozone members) to consider.

Pa tiltovao si ga sada

Hahah

реално један смо од беднијих народа у европи

Jebes li sta tamo u kini?

srpske firme izgradile pola Afrike i arapskih zemalja

kopali kanalizaciju u Libiji, uradili 4 km puta u Gabonu i kinezi im dali 0,06% deonica u Kataru, ono sa cime nece da se zajebavaju oni sami

haha bomb imas veliki respect od mene za ove postove

jna je bila medju pet vojnih sila sveta, bili smo prejaki pa su nas zato razbili

nije bila peta sila na svetu nego cetvrta ODBRAMBENA sila u evropi

Kontam koje dve da otpisem iz ekipe Rusija, Britanija, Nemacka, Francuska, Turska

Мислим да су се те приче односиле више на бројност војника него на квалитет војске и наоружање.... Исто као што је Северна Кореја данас ваљда друга или трећа најбројнија војска јер их има неколико милиона активних и у резерви....

otpisi francusku i tursku....jbg bili smo jaca odbrambena vojska od njih tada....jbg izvini al tako je

Питање је и кол'ко смо били бројни, мада комунистичке државе генерално имају увек пун курац војника, али овако по наоружању наравно да смо били курац.... Нуклеарно наоружање се увелико развило, а ми смо се дивили подморницама неким малим што смо имали....

а добро, мит некад буде и потврђен, није поента да сви буду нетачни, мада није ми најјасније шта значи одбрамбена сила

слем

Тактика Живојина Мишића са Колубаре се и дан данас изучава на светским војним школама.

Војна база негде у Аризони: Мајкл, спусти те сателите и пошаљи томахавке на отпад, промена плана Два извиђача да се ушуњају у Алеп пред зору и да сипају рицинус у казане талибана, Војска да буде наоружана само танџарама из ковачнице Милорада ашова, модел Наталија 1872. На гласно прдење непријатеља упадамо,

Их, само томахавке, јебеш и дронове, извиђај са балоном и бацај динамит из истог....

Војна база негде у Аризони: Мајкл, спусти те сателите и пошаљи томахавке на отпад, промена плана Два извиђача да се ушуњају у Алеп пред зору и да сипају рицинус у казане талибана, Војска да буде наоружана само танџарама из ковачнице Милорада ашова, модел Наталија 1872. На гласно прдење непријатеља упадамо,

Fejluješ, Bombi. Proučava se i Hanibalova taktika bojnog reda u obliku potkovice s kraja trećeg veka pre nove ere pa ne znači da Jenkiji jašu slonove. Primenjivali je u Iraku sa tenkovima.

proucava se, cinjenica da mi u skoli na jednom casu petog razreda procitamo uredjenje starog Egipta ne znaci da ga proucavamo, vec nastavnik pomene

Aha, baš su Amerikanci postali najača svetska vojna sila tako što su ofcirima samo usput, onako, spominjali vojne taktike. Boli ih kurac, imaju avione, kamione... Vijetnam živi dokaz da sve može na silu.

Od čoveka koji toliko potencira da je bio u ratu sam očekivao malo više poštovanja za vojni poziv.

Dzejms Bond nastao po modelu Duska Popova iz Titela.

Dzejms Bond izmisljeni lik nastao izrazloga sto je Flemingova porodica bila puna spijuna, pa i on sam je radio kao obavestajac, Duska Popova upoznao dok je ovaj bio spijun m6 i iskoristio jednu epizodu iz Portugalije sa Popovim iz kockarnice za nebitnu sekvencu u Kazinu Rojal.